Posted in IRS, Money, Money Finesse, Phone bills, Refunds, Tax, Telephone Tax Refunds on February 23rd, 2007
According to the IRS, about 30 percent of early filers did not ask for the telephone tax refund, and almost half of those omissions were made by paid tax preparers.
“We are surprised how many tax preparers are overlooking the telephone tax refund,†IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson said. “We want all taxpayers entitled to this refund to get it, whether they are using a tax preparer or doing the return themselves.â€
The Internal Revenue Service today urged taxpayers to check to see if they qualify for the telephone excise tax refund after more than 10 million early filers did not request the one-time refund. For people requesting the telephone tax refund, it adds $30 to $60 — or even more — onto a refund.
For information and help on requesting the telephone tax refund, visit the IRS website.
Posted in Advice, Consumer issues, IRS, Money, Money Finesse, Phone bills, Refunds, Tax, Tax forms, Telephone Tax Refunds on February 2nd, 2007
Early returns received by the IRS indicate many taxpayers are making mistakes when requesting the telephone tax refund. The telephone tax was institued in 1898 as a “luxury tax” but was recently ruled to be unconstitutional. Taxpayers are entitled to a refund equalling three years of actual Telephone Excise Tax paid or may claim the standard amount on the IRS forms.
Early mistakes found on a sample of 2006 returns filed during January include:
* Filling out the Form 1040EZ-T, Request for Refund of Federal Telephone Excise Tax, incorrectly by failing to show a refund amount on Line 1a. Designed exclusively for requesting the telephone-tax refund, this simple form is for people who don’t need to file a regular income-tax return. Filing an incomplete form typically delays a refund and often leads to follow-up correspondence with the IRS. More than 10 million low-income people, many of them senior citizens, are expected to file this form.
* Failing to request the telephone tax refund on a regular federal income-tax return in situations where the taxpayer appears to qualify. More than one-third of early filers did not request the telephone tax refund. This includes filers on Forms 1040, 1040A, 1040EZ, 1040NR and 1040NR-EZ. About 136 million individuals and couples are expected to file one of these forms, and most will, likely, qualify for the telephone-tax refund. Anyone who files one of these forms cannot file Form 1040EZ-T.
* Filing duplicate requests. Usually, this involves filing both Form 1040EZ-T and a regular income-tax return. Anyone who files a regular return cannot file Form 1040EZ-T. Doing so will delay any refund for months and result in a phone call or letter from the IRS.
* Requesting a refund that appears to be based on the entire amount of the taxpayer’s phone bills, rather than just the three-percent tax on long-distance and bundled service.
* Requesting a refund in the thousands of dollars, suggesting that the taxpayer paid more for telephone service than they received in income.
The IRS is investigating potential abuses among early filers who requested large and apparently improper amounts for the telephone tax refund. They will take prompt action against taxpayers who request improper refund amounts and the return preparers who help them.
For help in filing for the telephone tax refund, see the IRS website.
Posted in Cell phones, Consumer issues, Money, Money Finesse, News, Phone bills, Scams, Spam on January 26th, 2007
In the past week I have received 5 text messages on my cell phone offering me quick and easy loans online. These text messages are completely unsolicited and I have never heard of the websites being advertised, let alone been to them. Worse still, every text message could potentially cost me money if they cause me to exceed the alloted number of text messages in my plan.
Spam text messages to cell phones are becoming more common, more annoying and more costly for consumers. At least one company responsible for flooding cell phones with unsolicited text messages is being sued for violating the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The state of Illinois has filed a federal lawsuit against C & C Global Enterprises, L.L.C., www.resortsellers.com and two individuals, the operators of www.webuyresorts.com and www.resortsellers.com. The company has also been sued by Cingular Wireless and the state of Georgia for spamming cell phones with messages offering to buy the recipient’s time share, even though many of them didn’t own time shares.
Cell phone users often view their cell phone as their one refuge from unwanted calls and telemarketers, yet 8 in 10 cell phone users have received an unsolicted text messages. The incidence of cell phone spamming is expected to increase.
Mobile network operators are still in the early stages of testing technological answers to the problem of preventing spam attacks on their customers. If you receive spam text messages, report it to your carrier.
Posted in Consumer issues, Cutting costs, Debt Advice, Money, Money Finesse, Phone bills on September 12th, 2006
Looking for ways to reduce the high costs of communication? Is your phone bill too high because you are paying for services you don’t need or use? Consumer Reports has a list of five suggestions for lowering your phone bill, including switching to an internet service or dropping your landline altogether in favor of wireless phone service.
Read the full report here at Consumer Reports.